Glaucoma Research - Cataracts, Surgery, Treatment, Blindness

Glaucoma Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Glaucoma, including details on cataracts, surgery, treatment, blindness.


Glaucoma Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Glaucoma

Books on Glaucoma

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Otago Glaucoma Surgery Outcome Study: follow-up of young patients who underwent Molteno implant surgery.

Ah-Chan JJ, Molteno AC, Bevin TH, Herbison P

Eye Department, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand.

OBJECTIVE: To provide data on the results of patients with nonneovascular juvenile glaucoma who had Molteno implant surgery in the province of Otago, New Zealand. DESIGN: Prospective noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five operations in 52 eyes of 45 patients with nonneovascular juvenile glaucoma who had Molteno implant surgery between the ages of 9 and 49 years from 1976 to 2003 at Dunedin Hospital and were observed for a mean of 12.2 years (range, 0.1-25). INTERVENTION: Insertion of a Molteno implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual acuity (VA). RESULTS: Insertion of a Molteno implant controlled IOP at < or =21 mmHg with probabilities of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.97) at both 1 and 2 years and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.95), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.66-0.90), and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.85) at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Mean VA was 20/100 preoperatively; improved to 20/60 at 1 year; and stabilized at 20/120 at 5, 10, and 15 years postoperatively. Twenty-nine eyes had their preoperative VA maintained or improved at final follow-up, and the VAs of 17 eyes deteriorated but were at least light perception at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The use of Molteno implants in cases of nonneovascular juvenile glaucoma controlled IOP with a probability of 0.71 15 years postoperatively, whereas 53% maintained or improved their vision from their preoperative VA at final follow-up.

Published 5 December 2005 in Ophthalmology, 112(12): 2137-42.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Glaucoma Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Glaucoma Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (November)
  Issue 2 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Glaucoma Books

Rapid Diagnosis in Ophthalmology Series: Lens and Glaucoma (Rapid Diagnoses in Ophthalmology)

Rapid Diagnosis in Ophthalmology Series: Lens and Glaucoma (Rapid Diagnoses in Ophthalmology)